KEKRISTENAN DI DUNIA MODERN: GERAKAN-GERAKAN KEROHANIAN BESAR DI DUNIA BARAT MENJELANG ABAD KE-20
Pendahuluan
Menjelang abad ke-20 terjadi banyak perkembangan di dunia kekristenan modern. Perkembangan ini tidak dapat dilepaskan dari pengaruh masa pencerahan, dimana rasionalisme dan empirisme berkembang menjadi tema utama saat itu. Akibat dari perkembangan ini adalah lahirnya gerakan-gerakan kerohanian baru sebagai reaksi dari desakan rasionalisme dan empirisme tersebut. Dari bermacam-macam reaksi yang timbul dari perkembangan ini, kelompok akan membahas beberapa gerakan besar yang muncul pada masa itu.
Deisme, Keagamaan Rasional
Pada abad masa pencerahan terjadi revolusi besar-besaran dibidang intelektual. Semangat pencerahan ini mempunyai ciri atas kepercayaan akan akal budi; pandangannya yang optimistik terhadap dunia dan kodrat insani; kebebasan untuk menyelidiki/ meneliti dengan seksama. Para penganut semangat pencerahan ini percaya kebenaran hanya dapat diperoleh melalui akal budi. Jadi para semangat pencerahan ini disatukan oleh iman akal budi dan gairah untuk mencapai kesejahteraan iman.
Dalam situasi yang terjadi akibat timbulnya semangat pencerahan ini segala sesuatu diukur dengan menggunakan rasio. Dalam semangat pencerahan lahirlah sebuah paham baru yaitu deisme, yang merupakan bentuk rasionalisasi terhadap agama. kemunculan paham deisme ini dipelopori oleh P. Charron (1541-1648), J. Bodin (1530-1596), dan Lord Herbert Cherbury (1583-1648). C. Clarke membedakan 4 kelompok dalam deisme yaitu: pertama, kelompok yang mengakui Allah itu semata-mata pencipta yang tidak lagi mempunyai minat dan kepentingan terhadap dunia. Kedua, kelompok yang mengakui adanya penyelenggaraan Ilahi tetapi hanya dalam tata material, tidak dalam tata moral dan spiritual. Ketiga, kelompok yang percaya pada sifat moral tertentu pada Allah, tetapi tidak dalam suatu kehidupan yang menyangkut masa depan. Keempat, kelompok yang menerima semua kebenaran agama natural (asli), termasuk kepercayaan akan kehidupan yang akan datang.
Paham yang mengutamakan rasionalisme ini lahir di Inggris. Deisme ini terlihat untuk menghancurkan/ menghilangkan seluruh sejarah Kristen dan kekuasaan wahyu. Deisme menolak dogma dan doktrin yang bertentangan dengan rasionalisme.Salah satu yang mendukung agama rasio ini adalah George Barkeley (1685-1735), ia berpendapat tidak ada yang nyata kecuali rasio dan idea. Tidak ada pengetahuan lain dari apa yang dipanggil oleh pemikiran kita sendiri. Idea-idea yang luas dan bersifat mengikat harus menjadi produk yang bekerja dalam pemikiran kita sendiri. Ia juga mengklaim bahwa rasio adalah Tuhan. Selain itu ada juga tokoh yang bernama David Hume (1711-1776). Ia adalah tokoh empirisme yang mempunyai peranan penting pula dengan pemikirannya tentang agama. Ia juga mengklaim bahwa pengalaman adalah sumber dari semua pengetahuan. Ia melangkah lebih jauh lagi daripada “the deists” dalam mengkritik agama Kristen.
Skeptisisme merupakan ciri dari rasionalisme. Dalam kurun waktu kesadaran ini di tandai dengan adanya skeptisisme (Yunani “skeptikos” yang artinya penuh pertimbangan, refleksi, ingin tahu). Skeptisisme akan selalu mempertimbangkan, menguji, mengamati, atau memandang sesuatu dengan penuh perhatian. Paham ini mengklaim bahwa tidak ada pengetahuan yang mengcakup sesuatu atau pengetahuan yang absolut. Selain itu ada dua nama yang sangat representative dalam skeptic, yaitu Pierre Bayle, dan Anthony Collins. P. Bayle mengatakan bahwa semua keutamaan pribadi dan social bisa jadi dipraktikan baik oleh orang beragama maupun ateis. Selain itu karyanya Dictionnaire historique et critique di kategorikan dalam deistis anti-kristen. Anthony Collins menentang distingsi tradisonal antara hal-hal adikordati dan hal-hal yang bertentangan dengan akal sehat. Ia juga menegaskan bahwa orang perlu mencari dengan bebas hal-hal mana saja yang diajarkan kitab suci. Tokoh lainnya adalah Edwar Gibbon (1737-1794), ia mengklaim untuk menyebarkan kekristenan ia memberikan alasan-alasan diantaranya bahwa dalam menyebarkan kekristenan ada hubungannya dengan Yahudi, ada hubungannya juga dengan pengajaran keabadian, juga pada keajaiban merupakan anugerah (hadiah), tentang kesempurnaan moral, dan mengenai organisasi yang berdaya guna.
Pietisme
Pietisme adalah paham yang muncul dari akibat kemorosotan semangat orang akan iman kristennya. Pada tahun 1618-1648 Jerman sedang mengalami perang yang dilatar belakangi atas agama antara penganut-penganut katolik Roma dan refomasi. Perang ini ditutup dengan perjanjian Munster pada tahun 1648 tetapi akibat dari perang ini banyak menimbulkan kerugian dan kesengsaraan bagi Jerman seperti desa-desa musnah, uang kehilangan nilainya, sadisme dimana-mana Dll.
Dampak dari perang tersebut sampai kepada gereja. Saat itu gereja kelutheran hanya dapat tergantung hidupnya oleh raja-raja yang berkuasa. Keuangan gereja diatur Negara. Pendeta hidupnya melarat hanya terkandung dari perpuluhan dan kolekte. Maka sering kali pendeta menjadi alat raja dalam mempertahankan kuasanya.
Hal ini menyebabkan citra agama menjadi rusak. orang menjadi tidak berminat dan tidak terpanggil oleh kothbah dan pelayanan gereja. Gereja terlalu mendoktrinasi jemaatnya. Gereja tidak menjawab kebutuhan orang-orang saat itu. Kothbah-kothbah yang dibawakan tidak mendasari dengan realita yang terjadi di masyarakat. Orang-orang pun berpaham rasionalis. Iman dan kegiatan gereja hanya dianggap sebagai prakasa. Sebagian orang awam pasif, untuk menerima dogma yang ia yakini murni, untuk mendengar penjelasan dari mimbar, untuk berpartisipasi dalam sakramen dan hidup dengan aturan gereja.
Pietisme berasal dari kata Latin pietas yang berarti kesalehan. Pietisme merupakan istilah yang ditujukan kepada orang-orang yang hidup dalam kesalehan yang menuruti firman Tuhan. Gerakan ini muncul di kalangan jemaat gereja Lutheran dan dirintis Philipp Jacob Spener dengan tujuan menanamkan kehidupan protestantisme yang saat itu sedang tidak bersemangat. Pietisme memandang bahwa orang haruslah sadar atas ketidak mampuanya dan bersandar hanya kepada Yesus. Manusia tidak dapat mengandalkan akalnya saja tapi imannya kepada Yesus.
Pietisme menghendaki suatu penghayatan iman dengan hati, mulut dan perbuatan. Kegiatan ini dimulai dengan pertemuan-pertemuan religius di rumah Spener. Kegiatan Mereka berlanjut dengan berkumpul dalam persekutuan-persekutuan kecil untuk berlatih dalam doa, nyanyian, pembacaan Kitab Suci dan pemeriksaan diri sendiri. Panggilan Kristen bagi mereka berarti: pemisahan diri dari dunia, pengekangan hawa-nafsu dan keinginan-keinginan duniawi, dan usaha menghasilkan buah-buah iman. Pietisme peka dalam mengikuti kegiatan bidang pendidikan, panti asuhan, rumah sakit dan seterusnya. Ketika kothbah tidak menjawab kebutuhan jemaatnya saat itu, pietisme lantas hadir dengan kothbah praktis mengenai realita yang terjadi dan pengalaman hidup. Pietisme hadir dalam usaha menjawab kebutuhan dan kekosongan dari jemaat.
Tokoh Pelopor pietisme yang terkenal antara lain:
Philipp Jakob Spener
Spener dilahirkan pada tahun 1635 di Alcase. Ia ditahbiskan sebagai pendeta di Strassbourg. Pada tahun 1670 ia mendirikan perkumpulan pietisme yaitu Collegium Pietatis di jemaat Frankfurt. Ia menerbitkan buku yang berjudul Pia Desideria yang berisikan kecaman terhadap pemerintah yang menghalangi perbaikan gereja. Pada tahun 1705 ia meninggal dunia di kota Berlin.
Spener merupakan pelopor gerakan Pietisme. Ia merasa terpanggil untuk gereja saat itu. Ia merasa tidak puas dengan mutu kekristenan saat itu. Gereja ketika itu tidak memperhatikan iman jemaatnya. Mereka lebih tertarik dengan hal-hal yang menggunakan akal pikiran untuk berdebat seperti membahas teologi Biblika.
Hidup spiritual jemaat menjadi tidak terarah. Hal ini menyebabkan hubungan antara Allah dengan umat-Nya tidak mesra. Hidup jemaat haruslah diperbaharui. Kesalehan batin harus lebih banyak dihargai.
Ia mengajukan 6 usul untuk memperbaiki keadaan gereja:
1. Studi intensif Alkitab. Maksudnya, melakukan telaah alkitabiah sebagai wujud nyata dari pengembangan devosi (kebaktian) pribadi.
2. Pelaksanaan ibadat sepenuhnya ditangani oleh orang awam sebagai kepenuhan imamat spiritual mereka. Dasar utama pelaksanaan ibadat ini adalah panggilan kekristenan yang terungkap dalam baptis.
3. Menekankan praktek kehidupan kristen. Praktek ini diperlawankan dengan unsur-unsur intelektual. Tekanan semacam ini akan memuncak pada pelaksanaan semangat cinta kasih.
4. Mewujudnyatakan kasih dalam kontrovensi tentang (hal-hal) religius akan lebih memenangkan hati daripada kemenangan kontrovesial.
5. Reorganisasi studi-studi teologis pada universitas-universitas; dan menetapkan ukuran yang lebih tinggi berkenaan dengan kehidupan religius baik di antara para professor maupun para mahasiswa.
6. Membenahi pewartaan sabda atau kothbah-kothbah dengan maksud utama adalah pembangunan jemaat.
August Hermann Francke
Francke dilahirkan pada tanggal 22 maret 1633 di Lubeck. Pada tahun 1688 Franke bertemu dengan Spener. Francke banyak mendirikan sekolah-sekolah berdasarkan strata social pada masa itu. Ia adalah orang yang mempelopori adanya penginjilan.
Umumnya Francke mengembangkan gagasan-gagasan Spener. Hal yang penting dari pandangan teologi Francke adalah hubungan pribadi yang baru dengan Allah. Ia berpandangan bahwa Allah selalu berharap kita untuk lahir baru. Hanya dengan hubungan pribadi dengan Allah kita dapat menuju hidup baru itu.
Francke juga sangat memperhatikan orang miskin. Ia membuka sekolah untuk orang miskin di rumah. Sekolah tersebut pun berkembang pesat akibat banyak orang sekitar yang memberikan sumbangsih. Ia giat dalam percetakan Alkitab. Ia juga membuka sebuah panti asuhan.
Francke banyak mengalami kendala dalam kegiatanya terutama masalah keuangan tetapi Francke selalu pasrah akan apa yang terjadi kepada Tuhan. Francke memiliki harapan dalam melakukan setiap kegiatannya. Lembaga yang dibentuknya digunakan untuk perluasan kerajaan Allah. Pendidikan yang diselenggarakanya dibentuk untuk menanamkan rasa hormat kepada Tuhan dan menyiapkan para pekabar injil. Bagi Francke reformasi kehidupan tidak hanya di dalam geraja, tetapi harus di dalam seluruh system masyarakat.
3. Pekabaran Injil dan Peitisme
Pekabaran injil merupakan hasil dari tuntutan Pietisme. Gereja pada saat itu tidak merasa harus bertanggung jawab dalam hal penginjilan. Tugas tersebut seakan diserahkan gereja kepada kelompok pietis. Gereja saat itu terlalu sibuk membahas teori-teori akan doktrin yang benar tanpa ada kegiatan pelayanan yang nyata pada jemaatnya.
Pietisme mengalami pengaruh dari pencerahan. Pengaruh tersebut adalah individualisme (pertobatan pribadi). Dalam Pietisme individualisme sangat dihargai. Pertobatan pribadi sangat dituntut kepada setiap orang. Menurut Francke, teologi haruslah melayani perubahan hidup, pembaruan gereja, pembaruan bangsa dan penginjilan dunia. Maka kaum pietis terpanggil untuk melakukan penginjilan karena merupakan tugas hidup orang saleh.
Pekabaran penginjilan pertama digerakan oleh Francke. Pekabaran injil yang dirintisnya terbagi atas pengkabaran injil dalam negri dan pengkabaran injil luar negri. Pekabaran injil dalam negeri ia lakukan melalui pendidikan. Ia mendirikan sekolah untuk semua kalangan selain menjadi tempat mendidik juga sebagai tempat penyebaran injil. Pekabaran injil luar negri ia lakukan tanpa sengaja melalui dua utusan muridnya oleh seorang raja.
Pada tahun 1705 raja Denmark mencari dua orang misionaris untuk diutus ke india. Mereka adalah Bartholomeus Ziegembalg dan Heinrich Pliitschau. Mereka merupakan murid Francke. Mereka menulis pengalaman mereka di India yang mengilhami Francke untuk mengadakan pekabaran injil. Surat-surat itu juga disebar kemana-mana, dan dalam waktu singkat sumbangan-sumbangan untuk pekabaran mengalir ke Halle (pusat pietisme di jerman).
Hubungan Aufklarung dengan Pietisme
Aufklarung merupakan gerakan pencerahan yang terjadi di Jerman. Gerakan ini paralel dengan gerakan pietisme. Mereka hadir untuk mengapuskan kegiatan agama yang tidak bertanggung jawab. Pietisme hadir lebih dulu ketimbang Aufklarung. Pietisme mengalami pengaruh dari pencerahan mengenai pertobatan pribadi. Pietisme sekalipun selaras dengan Afklarung tetapi dalam penekanannya berbeda. Pietisme menekankan hati atau batin sedangkan Aufklarung menekankan pada akal.
Kemunculan Methodisme
Lahirnya persekutuan Methodis tidak dapat dilepaskan dari pengaruh John Wesley dan Charles Wesley, anak dari Samuel Wesley yang merupakan seorang pendeta dari gereja Anglikan. Mereka berdua mendirikan persekutuan Methodis yang kemudian berkembang menjadi lembaga gereja yang cukup besar pada masa itu. John Wesley lebih banyak berperan dalam proses berdirinya dan berkembangnya persekutuan ini, sedangkan adiknya, Charles, lebih berperan sebagai pendamping dan banyak membantu dengan kemampuannya menggubah lagu.
Setelah menamatkan pendidikan teologinya di Oxford College, John diangkat menjadi dosen bahasa Yunani di sekolah tersebut, dan pada tahun 1725 ia ditahbiskan kedalam jabatan diaken di gereja Anglikan, kemudian ia ditahbiskan menjadi imam (pendeta) di gereja tesebut pada tahun 1728. Kemudian ia bergabung dalam Holy Club yang didirikan adiknya, yang merupakan perkumpulan yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kehidupan rohani anggotanya. Perkumpulan ini melakukan disiplin rohani dengan menggunakan metode-metode yang sangat ketat, sehingga muncul istilah Metodis yang awalnya merupakan cemoohan. Di samping julukan Metodis, kelompok ini juga dijuluki Bible Moths (ngengat alkitab) dan the Enthusiast (yang menggebu), yang merupakan sindiran halus abad 18 bagi kaum fanatik.
Pada tahun 1735 John berkunjung ke Inggris dan bertemu dengan serombongan penginjil dari gereja Moravia, dan menjadi chaplain (pelayan rohani) untuk melayani kaum imigran Inggris di Amerika. Dia sangat tertarik dengan semangat penginjilan dan keteguhan iman para penginjil ini sehingga ia akhirnya cukup mendapat pengaruh dari kaum Moravian ini.
Kemudian yang menjadi titik balik dalam hidup Wesley adalah peristiwa ‘pertobatan iman’ yang ia alami pada tanggal 24 Mei 1738 yang ia catat dalam catatan hariannya. Ia mengatakan bahwa waktu itu ia merasakan hatinya dihangatkan dan ia merasa betul-betul memercayakan dirinya kepada Kristus. Pengalaman rohaninya ini sangat berpengaruh kemudian dalam pandangan teologi Metodhisme. Peristiwa lahir baru menjadi salah satu poin yang sangat penting dalam pokok ajaran Methodisme. Kemudian, berangkat dari pengalaman imannya tersebut, Wesley menjadi semakin bersemangat untuk melakukan penginjilan ke seluruh Inggris Raya dengan pengajaran kebangunan rohaninya. Namun sayang para pemimpin rohani dari gereja Anglikan pada waktu itu tidak setuju dengan praktek yang dilakukan oleh Wesley, dan melarang dia serta pengikutnya untuk berkhotbah di gereja. Oleh karena itulah kemudian Wesley membuat suatu pertemuan bagi pengikutnya dalam bentuk perkemahan, dan akhirnya menjadi tradisi di dalam lingkungan Metodis dan gerakan lain yang berakar dari persekutuan Metodis ini.
Pada awalnya Wesley tidak ingin memisahkan diri dari gereja Anglikan. Ia menganggap persekutuan yang ia dirikan hanyalah sebuah persekutuan untuk meningkatkan kualitas iman dan masih bagian dari gereja Anglikan. Oleh karena itu ia menganjurkan pengikutnya untuk tetap menghadiri kebaktian Minggu di gereja Anglikan dan tetap terlibat dalam Perjamuan Kudus di gereja tersebut dan tentu saja pokok-pokok ajaran dari methodisme ini juga banyak terpengaruh oleh gereja Anglikan. Namun karena gereja Anglikan menolak menahbiskan imam dari pengikutnya, maka persekutuan ini akhirnya memisahkan diri dari gereja Anglikan. Pada tahun 1784 ia menahbiskan dua orang diaken dan seorang diaken pada hari berikutnya. Gerakan ini kemudian menjadi semakin besar dan membentuk organisasi baru di Amerika. Methodisme bahkan pernah menjadi aliran Protestan terbesar di Amerika selama seabad (1820-1920).
Aliran Methodisme ini memiliki peran yang sangat penting bagi pertumbuhan kekristenan pada umumnya. Aliran ini menandai awal gerakan kebangkitan rohani, pertama-tama di Inggris, kemudian terus menyebar ke seluruh dunia. Banyak pemikiran teologis dari Methodisme yang di menjadi dasar bagi munculnya gerakan kebangkitan rohani baru seperti Pentakostalisme. Pokok ajaran Methodis yang berpengaruh bagi perkembangan kekristenan adalah pandangan bahwa manusia hanya bisa diselamatkan atas kasih karunia Allah, dan karunia tersebut berlaku bagi semua orang. Pemikiran ini sebenarnya banyak dipengaruhi oleh pandangan Jacobus Arminius, sehingga Methodis pun dianggap sebagai Arminianisme.
Pandangan ini tentu berpengaruh secara praktis dalam kehidupan penganut aliran ini. Gereja Methodis sangat bersemangat dalam gerakan-gerakan oikumenis. Gereja ini aktif dalam gerakan oikumene sedunia, sejak dari Konferensi Penginjilan Internasional (1910) hingga Dewan Gereja Sedunia terbentuk pada tahun 1948. Selain itu mereka juga sangat aktif dalam kegiatan-kegiatan kemanusiaan, terutama bidang pendidikan. Oleh karena itu mereka mendirikan sekolah Methodis.
Selain itu juga, gereja Methodis banyak sekali mempengaruhi Gereja-gereja Kristen lainnya, baik di dalam teologinya, maupun melalui liturgi mereka, khususnya melalui nyanyian-nyanyian yang disusun oleh kedua Wesley bersaudara – John dan Charles. Kedua bersaudara Wesley ini, khususnya Charles, menghasilkan sekitar 9.000 nyanyian rohani. Pengaruh teologi dari nyanyian-nyanyian ini sangat terasa di dalam teologi gereja-gereja khususnya dalam penekanan hubungan yang akrab antara manusia dengan Allah atau jaminan keselamatan yang dijanjikan Tuhan kepada manusia – ciri-ciri teologi yang sangat khas Methodis.
Gerakan Kebangunan Rohani
Suatu perubahan yang terjadi pada abad ke 18, adalah The Great Awakening atau yang biasa dikenal dengan kebangunan rohani. Sebuah perubahan yang memberikan dampak yang bukan hanya sekedar hiasan kekristenan di Amerika yang tampak indah, tetapi ia juga mempunyai suatu akibat yang besar dan berlangsung lama pada seluruh kehidupan dan pemikiran-pemikiran gereja Amerika. Kebangunan rohani terjadi melalui banyak tahapan dan berlangsung lebih dari separuh abad. Kekristenan pada waktu itu tidak berkembang secara efektif dan pada waktu itu juga sedang berkembang paham rasional. Kebangunan rohani analog dengan keadaan Pietisme di Jerman dan Pekabaran Injil di Inggris. Kebangunan rohani menekankan perubahan yang regenerative, yaitu sebuah konversi sebagai metode normal.
Kebangunan rohani mulai pada tahun 1726 di Raritan Valley di New Jersey, dibawah pimpinan pendeta Reformis Belanda, Theodore J. Frelinghuysen (1691-1748). Frelinghuysen rupanya merasa terpukul dengan merosotnya disiplin gereja Reformis dan harus menekankan tuntutan-tuntutan Alkitab untuk iman, penyesalan, dan pembaharuan hidup. William Tennet (1673-1745), mengajar beberapa anak muda dan termasuk juga ketiga anaknya, untuk di didik menjadi pendeta, usahanya ini melahirkan sebuah sekolah bernama “Log College” di utara Philadelphia. Anaknya, Gilbert Tennent, setelah lulus dari sekolah itu, ia diangkat menjadi pendeta di sebuah gereja Presbiterian di daerah New Jersey, dan ia mulai mengkhotbahkan tentang penghidupan kembali dibawah pengaruh Frelinghuysen, Gilbert Tennent menjadi tokoh utama dalam perubahan di denominasinya. Para lulusan dari “Log College”, menjadi pimpinan Kebangunan Rohani dalam Gereja Presbiterian dan berkembang menjadi sebuah golongan yang besar.
Kebangunan Rohani menyebar sampai ke Inggris, ditandai dengan kebangkitan di Northampton, Massachusetts pada tahun 1734-1735. Hal ini sangatlah menarik perhatian, terutama pada masa kepemimpinan Jonathan Edwards (1703-1758). Ia membela apa yang telah ia rasakan untuk mengalami kebangkitan rohani yang sesungguhnya, suatu pekerjaan bagi Allah, melawan mereka yang menolak semua emosionalisme dalam agama dan saling mengeksploitasi itu kepada yang lain. Pada tahun 1739, revival pecah kembali, menyebar hingga ke sisi Inggris. Kemashyuran peristiwa ini tersebar luas, hingga akhirnya pada tahun 1740 terbentuklah lembaga pendeta keliling oleh George Whitefield, teman sekerja Weasley, yang dipengaruhi oleh cerita Edwards. Cara Edwards mempunyai suatu ciri khas yang segera hilang dalam gerakan pada umumnya. Ia mempunyai dasar teologis yang kuat, dan menghindarkan diri dari menimbulkan krisis, berbeda dengan pemakaian bahasa yang bersemangat dalam khotbah-khotbah bersifat menerangkan, logis, dan teologis. Pola Edwards mengenai seseorang yang telah bertobat, berubah setelah kedatangan George Whitefield. Mengikuti Whitefield, penganut ajaran kebangunan rohani mulai berkeliling, mengadakan khotbah-khotbah dalam gereja-gereja tetangga.
Dalam kebangunan rohani, sempat terjadi pertikaian, yang berawal dari perdebatan oleh didalam pengikutnya. Pada tahun 1744, dewan pengajar Harvard menuduh Whitefield, karena “antusiasme” penganut kebangunan rohani ini dianggap bersifat anarki, suka mencela, praktek-praktek kemenangan yang meragukan dan khotbah yang tidak bijaksana. Ada yang berpikir hal ini benar, tetapi banyak juga yang berpikir seperti Charles Chauncy dari Boston, yang berpikir berjuang untuk hidup kegerejaan yang rasionalis dan berpikiran bebas.
Penganut-penganut aliran Kebangunan Rohani dari Kalangan Presbiterian dan Baptis, membawa gerakan ini ke negara-negara bagian dipantai Selatan Amerika Serikat. Kemudian disana terbentuk bagian-bagian baru dan disana orang-orang Baptis mulai mencoba perubahan-perubahan baru dan kemudian disempurnakan di Kentucky dan dinegara-negara bagian pertengahan Amerika Serikat. Hasil pertama dari perubahan ini adalah terbentuknya “Separate Baptist” (Baptis yang terpisah) dibawah Shubal Stearns di North Carolina pada tahun 1758. Kebangunan Rohani yang pertama ini mempunyai akibat-akibat yang penting untuk Gereja Amerika, seperti lembaga-lembaga yang sudah ada lebih bersifat gereja-gereja rakyat dan usaha-usaha perikemanusiaan dan misi dimulai. Tiga golongan dalam theologia di New England, dapat dibedakan setelah Kebangunan Rohani, yaitu Calvinis Lama, pengikut-pengikut Edwards dan kaum Liberal. Kebangunan Rohani memberikan sesuatu kepada gereja Amerika, yaitu kepercayaan pada diri sendiri yang membuat pemisahan yang tajam antara gereja dan negara sesuatu yang secara psikologis mudah diterima.
Kebangunan rohani yang kedua, terjadi di pantai Timur di Amerika Serikat. Hal ini terjadi dikarenakan sebuah usaha untuk merebut kembali semangat pekabaran Injil dalam gereja-gereja, dan pada daerah Tapal-Batas di mana sejarah pekabaran Injil yang paling berhasil ada di Amerika Serikat. Banyak terjadi perpindahan-perpindahan dari Amerika Serikat menuju daerah Barat. Ada beberapa pemimpin agama yang ikut berpindah, salah satunya James McCready, seorang Presbyterian dari Pennsylvania, yang pindah ke North Carolina dan kemudian ke Kentucky. Pada tahun 1800, bersama dengan seorang temannya, penginjil Methodis, memimpin “pertemuan Kemah” yang pertama dan resmi. Pertemuan Kemah itu adalah pertemuan distrik untk mengadakan Perjamuan Kudus, yang berlangsung beberapa hari dan 24 jam tiap harinya, dimana mereka yang hadir dipanggil, siang dan malam terus-menerus untuk menunjukkan bukti penyesalan sebagai tanda agar bisa mengikuti perjamuan Kudus. Kebangunan Rohani yang terkenal adalah di Cane Ridge pada bulan agustus 1801, yang dihadiri ribuan orang, dengan empat orang pendeta sebagai pengkhotbah dan 300 orang awam yang memberikan kesaksian.
Salah satu kelompok yang mengambil faedah dari kebangunan Rohani selain kaum Baptis, adalah kaum Methodis yang terpusat dan sangat disiplin, dibawah pimpinan Francis Asbury, mereka menyempurnakan suatu sistem “perjalanan keliling” yang dilayani oleh seorang “pengeliling jalan”, seorang pendeta yang bekerja penuh sebagai pengeliling jalan, berkhotbah dan tidur dimana saja dan terkadang sering meninggal dalam tugasnya. Pelopor-pelopor yang tidak menikah ini, telah membantu mengembangkan Gereja Methodis dari jumlah anggota 15.000 orang pada tahun 1784 dan pada tahun 1816, telah menjadi 200.000 orang. Pada sekitar tahun 1825, kebangunan Rohani menjadi suatu lembaga Methodis, sifat aliran Kebangunan Rohani yang asli dan non-denominasi menjadi berubah, karena dipengaruhi oleh lagu kebangunan Rohani yang berakhir dengan “I’m bound to march in endless bliss, and die a shouting Methodis” ( saya harus berbaris dalam kebahagiaan yang tiada akhirnya, dan harus mati sebagai seorang Methodis yang berteriak)
Kebangunan Rohani yang kedua ini adalah yang paling berhasil dalam hal pekabaran Injil di Amerika Serikat bagian Barat. Pada waktu yang sama, zaman itu memberi cara yang permanen kepada Protestantisme Amerika, yang condong pada kebaktian yang bebas dan emosional dengan jemaat yang bersifat mandiri (kecuali untuk kaum Methodis) dan suatu sikap yang tidak teologis. Hal lain yang membuat kebangunan Rohani ini berbeda dengan yang pertama adalah perjuangan sosial yang ada didalamnya, khususnya di New York dan pantai laut Timur Amerika Serikat.
Sumbangan pemikiran Amerika sendiri dalam kehidupan keagamaan di Amerika Serikat, berupa suatu bentuk yang sering di cap sebagai fundamentalis: seolah-olah orang Amerika memang maju di bidang teknologi sampai ke tingkat yang paling tinggi, tetapi di bidang keagamaan pada umumnya agak konservatif, cenderung menerima naskah kitab suci secara harfiah. Tentu saja cap ini dibicarakan dengan nada yang agak negatif. Sebutan fundamentalis pada umumnya diberikan kepada gerakan-gerakan yang sering melakukan kombinasi dari dua unsur, mengharap kedatangan Yesus yang kedua kalinya dalam waktu yang agak dekat dan menolak semua penelitian “ilmiah” terhadap Kitab Suci dan agama. Fundamentalis Amerika Serikat sama terjadi dengan Teologi liberal Eropa, tidak pernah diterima secara besar-besaran di Amerika, tetapi sering berfungsi sebagai referensi dan menjadi titik-tolak pemikiran mereka. Karena fundamentalis tidak bisa dibilang sebagai kelompok tertentu, tetapi sebagai pemikiran yang ditemukan dalam sejumlah kelompok dan gereja, maka tidak pernah ada rumusan doktrinnya yang diterima secara “resmi” atau umum.
Tabel Kronologis
Pada tahun 1618-1648 : Jerman sedang mengalami perang yang dilatar belakangi atas agama
Pada tahun 1648 : Perjanjian Musnter dicetuskam sebagai penutup perang tersebut
Pada tahun 1670 : Philip Jacob Spener mendirikan perkumpulan pietisme pertama yaitu Collegium Pietatis di jemaat Frankfurt.
Sekitar 1677 : di Darmstadt, istilah Pietisme muncul di kalangan gereja Luther
Pada tahun 1688 : Francke bertemu dengan Spener.
Pada tahun 1706 : Raja Denmark mengutus dua orang murid Francke missionaris ke india.
Pada tahun 1726 : Kebangunan rohani dimulai di Raritan Valley di New Jersey, dibawah pimpinan pendeta Reformis Belanda, Theodore J. Frelinghuysen
Pada tanggal 24 Mei 1738 : peristiwa ‘pertobatan iman’ yang dialami Wesley
Pada tahun 1734-1735 : kebangkitan di Northampton, Massachusetts.
Pada tahun 1739 : Revival pecah kembali, menyebar hingga ke sisi Inggris.
Pada tahun 1740 : terbentuklah lembaga pendeta keliling oleh George Whitefield\
Pada tahun 1784 : Gereja Methodis jumlah anggota 15.000 orang
Pada bulan agustus 1801 : berlangsung Kebangunan Rohani di Cane Ridge yang terkenal
Pada tahun 1816 : Gereja Methodis jumlah anggota telah menjadi 200.000 orang.
sekitar tahun 1825 : kebangunan Rohani menjadi suatu lembaga Methodis, sifat aliran Kebangunan.
Pada tahun1820-1920 : Methodisme bahkan menjadi aliran Protestan terbesar di Amerika selama
Daftar Pustaka
Aritonang, Jan S., Berbagai Aliran di Dalam dan di Sekitar Gereja, Jakarta : BPK Gunung MUlia, 2001.
Hale, Leonard., Jujur Terhadap Pietisme, Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 1994.
Kristiyanto, Eddy. Reformasi dari Dalam: Sejarah Gereja Zaman Modern, Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2004.
Steenbrink, Karel A., Perkembangan Teologi dalam Dunia Kristen Modern, Yogyakarta: IAIN Sunan Kalijaga Press, 1987.
Thomson, Alan., Gereja Kristen di Amerika Utara, Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 1973.
Walker, Williston. A History Of The Christian Church, Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark LTD, 1970.
Wand, J.W.C., A history of the modern church, London: Methuaen LTD, 1957.
Beberapa Khotbah Penting dari Tokoh Methosime, Pietisme, dan Gerakan Kebangunan Rohani
Salvation by Faith
by John Wesley (18th June 1738)
"By grace are ye saved through faith." - Eph. 2:8.
All the blessings which God hath bestowed upon man are of his mere grace, bounty, or favour; his free, undeserved favour; favour altogether undeserved; man having no claim to the least of his mercies. It was free grace that "formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into him a living soul," and stamped on that soul the image of God, and "put all things under his feet." The same free grace continues to us, at this day, life, and breath, and all things. For there is nothing we are, or have, or do, which can deserve the least thing at God's hand. "All our works, Thou, O God, hast wrought in us." These, therefore, are so many more instances of free mercy: and whatever righteousness may be found in man, this is also the gift of God.
Wherewithal then shall a sinful man atone for any the least of his sins? With his own works? No. Were they ever so many or holy, they are not his own, but God's. But indeed they are all unholy and sinful themselves, so that every one of them needs a fresh atonement. Only corrupt fruit grows on a corrupt tree. And his heart is altogether corrupt and abominable; being "come short of the glory of God," the glorious righteousness at first impressed on his soul, after the image of his great Creator. Therefore, having nothing, neither righteousness nor works, to plead, his mouth is utterly stopped before God.
If then sinful men find favour with God, it is "grace upon grace!" If God vouchsafe still to pour fresh blessings upon us, yea, the greatest of all blessings, salvation; what can we say to these things, but, "Thanks be unto God for his unspeakable gift!" And thus it is. herein "God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died" to save us "By grace" then "are ye saved through faith." Grace is the source, faith the condition, of salvation.
Now, that we fall not short of the grace of God, it concerns us carefully to inquire,
I. What faith it is through which we are saved.
II. What is the salvation which is through faith.
III. How we may answer some objections.
I. What faith it is through which we are saved.
And, first, it is not barely the faith of a heathen. Now, God requireth of a heathen to believe, "that God is; that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him;" and that he is to be sought by glorifying him as God, by giving him thanks for all things, and by a careful practice of moral virtue, of justice, mercy, and truth, toward their fellow creatures. A Greek or Roman, therefore, yea, a Scythian or Indian, was without excuse if he did not believe thus much: the being and attributes of God, a future state of reward and punishment, and the obligatory nature of moral virtue. For this is barely the faith of a heathen.
Nor, secondly, is it the faith of a devil, though this goes much farther than that of a heathen. For the devil believes, not only that there is a wise and powerful God, gracious to reward, and just to punish; but also, that Jesus is the Son of God, the Christ, the Saviour of the world. So we find him declaring, in express terms, "I know Thee who Thou art; the Holy One of God" (Luke 4:34). Nor can we doubt but that unhappy spirit believes all those words which came out of the mouth of the Holy One, yea, and whatsoever else was written by those holy men of old, of two of whom he was compelled to give that glorious testimony, "These men are the servants of the most high God, who show unto you the way of salvation." Thus much, then, the great enemy of God and man believes, and trembles in believing, -- that God was made manifest in the flesh; that he will "tread all enemies under his feet;" and that "all Scripture was given by inspiration of God." Thus far goeth the faith of a devil.
Thirdly. The faith through which we are saved, in that sense of the word which will hereafter be explained, is not barely that which the Apostles themselves had while Christ was yet upon earth; though they so believed on him as to "leave all and follow him;" although they had then power to work miracles, to "heal all manner of sickness, and all manner of disease;" yea, they had then "power and authority over all devils;" and, which is beyond all this, were sent by their Master to "preach the kingdom of God."
What faith is it then through which we are saved? It may be answered, first, in general, it is a faith in Christ: Christ, and God through Christ, are the proper objects of it. herein, therefore, it is sufficiently, absolutely distinguished from the faith either of ancient or modern heathens. And from the faith of a devil it is fully distinguished by this: it is not barely a speculative, rational thing, a cold, lifeless assent, a train of ideas in the head; but also a disposition of the heart. For thus saith the Scripture, "With the heart man believeth unto righteousness;" and, "If thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thy heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved."
And herein does it differ from that faith which the Apostles themselves had while our Lord was on earth, that it acknowledges the necessity and merit of his death, and the power of his resurrection. It acknowledges his death as the only sufficient means of redeeming man from death eternal, and his resurrection as the restoration of us all to life and immortality; inasmuch as he "was delivered for our sins, and rose again for our justification." Christian faith is then, not only an assent to the whole gospel of Christ, but also a full reliance on the blood of Christ; a trust in the merits of his life, death, and resurrection; a recumbency upon him as our atonement and our life, as given for us, and living in us; and, in consequence hereof, a closing with him, and cleaving to him, as our "wisdom, righteousness, sanctification, and redemption," or, in one word, our salvation.
II. What salvation it is, which is through this faith, is the Second thing to be considered.
And, First, whatsoever else it imply, it is a present salvation. It is something attainable, yea, actually attained, on earth, by those who are partakers of this faith. For thus saith the Apostle to the believers at Ephesus, and in them to the believers of all ages, not, Ye shall be (though that also is true), but, "Ye are saved through faith."
Ye are saved (to comprise all in one word) from sin. This is the salvation which is through faith. This is that great salvation foretold by the angel, before God brought his First-begotten into the world: "Thou shalt call his name Jesus; for he shall save his people from their sins." And neither here, nor in other parts of holy writ, is there any limitation or restriction. All his people, or, as it is elsewhere expressed, "all that believe in him," he will save from all their sins; from original and actual, past and present sin, "of the flesh and of the spirit." Through faith that is in him, they are saved both from the guilt and from the power of it.
First. From the guilt of all past sin: for, whereas all the world is guilty before God, insomuch that should he "be extreme to mark what is done amiss, there is none that could abide it;" and whereas, "by the law is" only "the knowledge of sin," but no deliverance from it, so that, "by" fulfilling "the deeds of the law, no flesh can be justified in his sight": now, "the righteousness of God, which is by faith of Jesus Christ, is manifested unto all that believe." Now, "they are justified freely by his grace, through the redemption that is in Jesus Christ." "Him God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for (or by) the remission of the sins that are past." Now hath Christ taken away "the curse of the law, being made a curse for us." he hath "blotted out the handwriting that was against us, taking it out of the way, nailing it to his cross." "There is therefore no condemnation now to them which" believe "in Christ Jesus."
And being saved from guilt, they are saved from fear. Not indeed from a filial fear of offending; but from all servile fear; from that fear which hath torment; from fear of punishment; from fear of the wrath of God, whom they now no longer regard as a severe Master, but as an indulgent Father. "They have not received again the spirit of bondage, but the Spirit of adoption, whereby they cry, Abba, Father: the Spirit itself also bearing witness with their spirits, that they are the children of God." They are also saved from the fear, though not from the possibility, of falling away from the grace of God, and coming short of the great and precious promises. Thus have they "peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ. They rejoice in hope of the glory of God. And the love of God is shed abroad in their hearts, through the Holy Ghost, which is given unto them." And hereby they are persuaded (though perhaps not at all times, nor with the same fullness of persuasion), that "neither death, nor life, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate them from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord."
Again: through this faith they are saved from the power of sin, as well as from the guilt of it. So the Apostle declares, "Ye know that he was manifested to take away our sins; and in him is no sin. Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not" (1 John 3:5ff.). Again, "Little children, let no man deceive you. he that committeth sin is of the devil. Whosoever believeth is born of God. And whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God." Once more: "We know that whosoever is born of God sinneth not; but he that is begotten of God keepeth himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not" (1 John 5:18).
He that is, by faith, born of God sinneth not (1.) by any habitual sin; for all habitual sin is sin reigning: But sin cannot reign in any that believeth. Nor (2.) by any wilful sin: for his will, while he abideth in the faith, is utterly set against all sin, and abhorreth it as deadly poison. Nor
(3.) By any sinful desire; for he continually desireth the holy and perfect will of God. and any tendency to an unholy desire, he by the grace of God, stifleth in the birth. Nor
(4.) Doth he sin by infirmities, whether in act, word, or thought; for his infirmities have no concurrence of his will; and without this they are not properly sins. Thus, "he that is born of God doth not commit sin": and though he cannot say he hath not sinned, yet now "he sinneth not."
This then is the salvation which is through faith, even in the present world: a salvation from sin, and the consequences of sin, both often expressed in the word justification; which, taken in the largest sense, implies a deliverance from guilt and punishment, by the atonement of Christ actually applied to the soul of the sinner now believing on him, and a deliverance from the power of sin, through Christ formed in his heart. So that he who is thus justified, or saved by faith, is indeed born again. He is born again of the Spirit unto a new life, which "is hid with Christ in God." And as a new-born babe he gladly receives the adolon, "sincere milk of the word, and grows thereby;" going on in the might of the Lord his God, from faith to faith, from grace to grace, until at length, he come unto "a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ."
III. The first usual objection to this is,
That to preach salvation or justification, by faith only, is to preach against holiness and good works. To which a short answer might be given: "It would be so, if we spake, as some do, of a faith which was separate from these; but we speak of a faith which is not so, but productive of all good works, and all holiness."
But it may be of use to consider it more at large; especially since it is no new objection, but as old as St. Paul's time. For even then it was asked, "Do we not make void the law through faith?" We answer, First, all who preach not faith do manifestly make void the law; either directly and grossly, by limitations and comments that eat out all the spirit of the text; or indirectly, by not pointing out the only means whereby it is possible to perform it. Whereas, Secondly, "we establish the law," both by showing its full extent and spiritual meaning; and by calling all to that living way, whereby "the righteousness of the law may be fulfilled in them." These, while they trust in the blood of Christ alone, use all the ordinances which he hath appointed, do all the "good works which he had before prepared that they should walk therein," and enjoy and manifest all holy and heavenly tempers, even the same mind that was in Christ Jesus.
But does not preaching this faith lead men into pride? We answer, Accidentally it may: therefore ought every believer to be earnestly cautioned, in the words of the great Apostle "Because of unbelief, " the first branches "were broken off: and thou standest by faith. Be not high-minded, but fear. If God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he spare not thee. Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God! On them which fell, severity; but towards thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness; otherwise thou also shalt be cut off." And while he continues therein, he will remember those words of St. Paul, foreseeing and answering this very objection (Rom. 3:27), "Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith." If a man were justified by his works, he would have whereof to glory. But there is no glorying for him "that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly" (Rom. 4:5). To the same effect are the words both preceding and following the text (Eph. 2:4ff.): "God, who is rich in mercy, even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ (by grace ye are saved), that he might show the exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness toward us through Christ Jesus. For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves." Of yourselves cometh neither your faith nor your salvation: "it is the gift of God;" the free, undeserved gift; the faith through which ye are saved, as well as the salvation which he of his own good pleasure, his mere favour, annexes thereto. That ye believe, is one instance of his grace; that believing ye are saved, another. "Not of works, lest any man should boast." For all our works, all our righteousness, which were before our believing, merited nothing of God but condemnation; so far were they from deserving faith, which therefore, whenever given, is not of works. Neither is salvation of the works we do when we believe, for it is then God that worketh in us: and, therefore, that he giveth us a reward for what he himself worketh, only commendeth the riches of his mercy, but leaveth us nothing whereof to glory.
"However, may not the speaking thus of the mercy of God, as saving or justifying freely by faith only, encourage men in sin?" Indeed, it may and will: Many will "continue in sin that grace may abound: " But their blood is upon their own head. The goodness of God ought to lead them to repentance; and so it will those who are sincere of heart. When they know there is yet forgiveness with him, they will cry aloud that he would blot out their sins also, through faith which is in Jesus. And if they earnestly cry, and faint not, it they seek him in all the means he hath appointed; if they refuse to be comforted till he come; "he will come, and will not tarry." And he can do much work in a short time. Many are the examples, in the Acts of the Apostles, of God's working this faith in men's hearts, even like lightning falling from heaven. So in the same hour that Paul and Silas began to preach, the jailer repented, believed, and was baptized; as were three thousand, by St. Peter, on the day of Pentecost, who all repented and believed at his first preaching And, blessed be God, there are now many living proofs that he is still "mighty to save."
Yet to the same truth, placed in another view, a quite contrary objection is made: "If a man cannot be saved by all that he can do, this will drive men to despair." True, to despair of being saved by their own works, their own merits, or righteousness. And so it ought; for none can trust in the merits of Christ, till he has utterly renounced his own. he that "goeth about to stablish his own righteousness" cannot receive the righteousness of God. The righteousness which is of faith cannot be given him while he trusteth in that which is of the law.
But this, it is said, is an uncomfortable doctrine. The devil spoke like himself, that is, without either truth or shame, when he dared to suggest to men that it is such. It is the only comfortable one, it is "very full of comfort," to all self-destroyed, self-condemned sinners. That "whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed that the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him": here is comfort, high as heaven, stronger than death! What! Mercy for all? For Zacchaeus, a public robber? For Mary Magdalene, a common harlot? Methinks I hear one say "Then I, even I, may hope for mercy!" And so thou mayest, thou afflicted one, whom none hath comforted! God will not cast out thy prayer. Nay, perhaps he may say the next hour, "Be of good cheer, thy sins are forgiven thee;" so forgiven, that they shall reign over thee no more; yea, and that "the Holy Spirit shall bear witness with thy spirit that thou art a child of God." O glad tidings! tidings of great joy, which are sent unto all people! "Ho, every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters: Come ye, and buy, without money and without price." Whatsoever your sins be, "though red like crimson," though more than the hairs of your head, "return ye unto the Lord, and he will have mercy upon you, and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon."
When no more objections occur, then we are simply told that salvation by faith only ought not to be preached as the first doctrine, or, at least, not to be preached at all. But what saith the Holy Ghost? "Other foundation can no man lay than that which is laid, even Jesus Christ." So then, that "whosoever believeth on him shall be saved, " is, and must be, the foundation of all our preaching; that is, must be preached first. "Well, but not to all." To whom, then are we not to preach it? Whom shall we except? The poor? Nay; they have a peculiar right to have the gospel preached unto them. The unlearned? No. God hath revealed these things unto unlearned and ignorant men from the beginning. The young? By no means. "Suffer these," in any wise, "to come unto Christ, and forbid them not." The sinners? Least of all. "He came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance." Why then, if any, we are to except the rich, the learned, the reputable, the moral men. And, it is true, they too often except themselves from hearing; yet we must speak the words of our Lord. For thus the tenor of our commission runs, "Go and preach the gospel to every creature." If any man wrest it, or any part of it, to his destruction, he must bear his own burden. But still, "as the Lord liveth, whatsoever the Lord saith unto us, that we will speak."
At this time, more especially, will we speak, that "by grace are ye saved through faith": because, never was the maintaining this doctrine more seasonable than it is at this day. Nothing but this can effectually prevent the increase of the Romish delusion among us. It is endless to attack, one by one, all the errors of that Church. But salvation by faith strikes at the root, and all fall at once where this is established. It was this doctrine, which our Church justly calls the strong rock and foundation of the Christian religion, that first drove Popery out of these kingdoms; and it is this alone can keep it out. Nothing but this can give a check to that immorality which hath "overspread the land as a flood." Can you empty the great deep, drop by drop? Then you may reform us by dissuasives from particular vices. But let the "righteousness which is of God by faith be brought in, and so shall its proud waves be stayed. Nothing but this can stop the mouths of those who "glory in their shame, and openly deny the Lord that bought them." They can talk as sublimely of the law, as he that hath it written by God in his heart To hear them speak on this head might incline one to think they were not far from the kingdom of God: but take them out of the law into the gospel; begin with the righteousness of faith; with Christ, "the end of the law to every one that believeth;" and those who but now appeared almost, if not altogether, Christians, stand confessed the sons of perdition; as far from life and salvation (God be merciful unto them!) as the depth of hell from the height of heaven.
For this reason the adversary so rages whenever "salvation by faith" is declared to the world: for this reason did he stir up earth and hell, to destroy those who first preached it. And for the same reason, knowing that faith alone could overturn the foundations of his kingdom, did he call forth all his forces, and employ all his arts of lies and calumny, to affright Martin Luther from reviving it. Nor can we wonder thereat; for, as that man of God observes, "How would it enrage a proud, strong man armed, to be stopped and set at nought by a little child coming against him with a reed in his hand!" especially when he knew that little child would surely overthrow him, and tread him under foot. Even so, Lord Jesus! Thus hath Thy strength been ever "made perfect in weakness!" Go forth then, thou little child that believest in him, and his "right hand shall teach thee terrible things !" Though thou art helpless and weak as an infant of days, the strong man shall not be able to stand before thee. Thou shalt prevail over him, and subdue him, and overthrow him and trample him under thy feet. Thou shalt march on, under the great Captain of thy salvation, "conquering and to conquer," until all thine enemies are destroyed, and "death is swallowed up in victory."
Now, thanks be to God, which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ; to whom, with the Father and the Holy Ghost, be blessing, and glory, and wisdom, and thanksgiving, and honour, and power, and might, for ever and ever. Amen
http://www.nathan.co.za/wesley/wesley.asp
All True Grace in the Heart Tends to Holy Practice in the Life
by Jonathan Edwards (1703-1758)
"Charity . . . rejoices not in iniquity, but rejoices in the truth." -- 1 Corinthians 13:6
Having mentioned, in the two preceding verses, many of the good fruits of charity, and shown how it tends to an excellent behavior in many particulars, the apostle now sums up these and all other good tendencies of charity, in respect to active conduct, by saying, “It rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth.” As if he had said, “I have mentioned many excellent things that charity has a tendency to, and shown how it is contrary to many evil things. But I need not go on to multiply particulars, for, in a word, charity is contrary to everything in the life and practice that is evil, and tends to everything that is good — it rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth.
By “iniquity,” seems to be intended here everything that is sinful in the life and practice; and by “the truth,” everything that is good in the life, or all that is included in Christian and holy practice. The word truth is, indeed, variously used in the Bible. Sometimes it means the true doctrines of religion; sometimes the knowledge of these doctrines; sometimes veracity or faithfulness; and sometimes it signifies all virtue and holiness, including both the knowledge and reception of all the great truths of the Scriptures, and conformity to these in the life and conduct. In this last sense the word is used by the apostle John, when he says, “I rejoiced greatly when the brethren came and testified of the truth that is in thee, even as thou walkest in the truth” (3 John 3). Taking the word in this sense, and generalizing the proposition, we have, as suggested by the text, the doctrine,
THAT ALL TRUE CHRISTIAN GRACE IN THE HEART TENDS TO HOLY PRACTICE IN THE LIFE.
Negatively, the apostle declares that charity is opposed to all wickedness, or evil practice; and, positively, that it tends to all righteousness, or holy practice. And as the principle may be generalized and also as charity has been shown to be the sum of all true and saving grace, the doctrine that has been stated seems clearly contained in the word of the text, viz. the doctrine, that all true Christian grace tends to holy practice. If any have the notion of grace, that it is something put into the heart, there to be confined and dormant, and that its influence does not govern the man throughout as an active being — or if they suppose that the change made by grace, though it indeed betters the heart itself, yet has no tendency to a corresponding improvement of the outward life — they have a very wrong notion. And that this is so, I would endeavor to make plain, first, by some arguments in favor of the doctrine that has been stated; and, second, by showing its truth with respect to particular graces. And,
I. I would state some arguments in support of the doctrine, that all true grace in the heart tends to holy practice in the life. And,
1. Holy practice is the aim of that eternal election which is the first ground of the bestowment of all true grace. — Holy practice is not the ground and reason of election, as is supposed by the Arminians, who imagine that God elects men to everlasting life upon a foresight of their good works; but it is the aim and end of election. God does not elect men because he foresees they will be holy, but that he may make them, and that they may be holy. Thus, in election, God ordained that men should walk in good works, as says the apostle, “For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them” (Eph. 2:10). And again it is said, that the elect are chosen to this very end — “He hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy, and without blame before him in love” (Eph. 1:4). And so Christ tells his disciples, “I have chosen you, and ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain” (John 15:16). Now God’s eternal election is the first ground of the bestowment of saving grace. And some have such saving grace, and others do not have it, because some are from eternity chosen of God, and others are not chosen. And seeing that holy practice is the scope and aim of that which is the first ground of the bestowment of grace, this same holy practice is doubtless the tendency of grace itself. Otherwise it would follow, that God makes use of a certain means to attain an end, which is not fitted to attain that end, and has no tendency to it. It is further true,
2. That redemption, by which grace is purchased, is to the same end. — The redemption made by Christ is the next ground of the bestowment of grace on all who possess it. Christ, by his merits, in the great things that he did and suffered in the world, has purchased grace and holiness for his own people — “For their sakes,” he says, “I sanctify myself that they also might be sanctified through the truth” (John 17:19). And Christ thus redeemed the elect, and purchased grace for them, to the end that they might walk in holy practice. He has reconciled them to God by his death, to save them from wicked works, that they might be holy and unblamable in their lives, says the apostle — “And you, that were sometime alienated, and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled in the body of his flesh through death, to present you holy, and unblameable, and unreproveable in his sight” (Col. 1:21, 22). When the angel appeared to Joseph, he told him that the child that should be born of Mary should be called Jesus, that is, Savior, because he should save his people from their sins (Mat. 1:21). And holiness of life is declared to be the end of redemption, when it is said of Christ, that he “gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works” (Titus 2:14). And so we are told that Christ “died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him which died for them and rose again” (2 Cor. 5:15). And for this end, he is said to have offered himself, through the eternal Spirit, without spot to God, that his blood might purge our conscience from dead works to serve the living God (Heb. 9:14).
The most remarkable type of the work of redemption by divine love in all the Old Testament history, was the redemption of the children of Israel out of Egypt. But the holy living of his people was the end God had in view in that redemption, as he often signified to Pharaoh, when from time to time he said to him by Moses and Aaron, “Let my people go, that they may serve me.” And we have a like expression concerning Christ’s redemption in the New Testament, where it is said, “Blessed be the Lord God of Israel; for he hath visited and redeemed his people,…. to perform the mercy promised to our fathers, and to remember his holy covenant, the oath which he sware to our father Abraham, that he would grant unto us, that we, being delivered out of the hand of our enemies, might serve him without fear, in holiness and righteousness before him, all the days of our life” (Luke 1:68-75). All these things make it very plain that the end of redemption is, that we might be holy. Still further it is true,
3. That effectual calling, or that saving conversion in which grace is commenced in the soul, is to the same end. — God, by his Spirit, and through his truth, calls, awakens, convicts, converts, and leads to the exercise of grace, all those who are made willing in the day of his power, to the end that they might exercise themselves in holy practice. “We are his workmanship,” says the apostle, “created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them” (Eph. 2:10). And the apostle tells the Christian Thessalonians, that God had not called them unto uncleanness, but unto holiness (1 Thes. 4:7). And again it is written, “As he which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation” (1 Pet. 1:15). It is also true,
4. That spiritual knowledge and understanding which are the inward attendants of all true grace in the heart, tend to holy practice. — A true knowledge of God and divine things is a practical knowledge. As to a mere speculative knowledge of the things of religion, many wicked men have attained to great measures of it. Men may possess vast learning, and their learning may consist very much of their knowledge in divinity, and of the Bible, and of the things pertaining to religion, and they may be able to reason very strongly about the attributes of God and the doctrines of Christianity, and yet herein their knowledge fails of being a saving knowledge, that it is only speculative and not practical. He that has a right and saving acquaintance with divine things, sees the excellency of holiness, and of all the ways of holiness, for he sees the beauty and excellency of God, which consist in his holiness; and, for the same reason, he sees the hatefulness of sin, and of all the ways of sin. And if a man knows the hatefulness of the ways of sin, certainly this tends to his avoiding these ways; and if he sees the loveliness of the ways of holiness, this tends to incline him to walk in them.
He that knows God, sees that he is worthy to be obeyed. Pharaoh did not see why he should obey God, because he did not know who he was, and therefore he says — “Who is the Lord, that I should obey his voice? I know not the Lord, neither will I let Israel go” (Exo. 5:2). This is signified to be the reason why wicked men work or practice iniquity, and carry themselves so wickedly, that they have no spiritual knowledge, as says the Psalmist — “Have all the workers of iniquity no knowledge? who eat up my people as they eat bread, and call not upon the Lord” (Psa. 14:4). And when God would describe the true knowledge of himself to the people of Israel, he does it by this fruit of it, that it led to holy practice — “He judged the cause of the poor and needy; then it was well with him. Was not this to know me? saith the Lord” (Jer. 22:16). And so the apostle John informs us that the keeping of Christ’s commands is an infallible fruit of our knowing him; and he stigmatizes him as a gross hypocrite and liar who pretends that he knows Christ, and does not keep his commandments (1 John 2:3, 4). If a man has spiritual knowledge and understanding, it tends to make him to be of an excellent spirit. “A man of understanding is of an excellent spirit” (Pro. 17:27). And such an excellent spirit will lead to a corresponding behavior. And the same appears, also,
5. From the more immediate consideration of the principle of grace itself, from which it will be seen that the tendency of all Christian grace is to practice. — And here,
First, it appears that all true Christian grace tends to practice, because the faculty which is the immediate seat of it is the faculty of the will, which is the faculty that commands all a man’s actions and practice. The immediate seat of grace is in the will or disposition. And this shows that all true grace tends to practice; for there is not one of man’s acts that can properly be said to belong to or to be any part of his practice, in any respect but that it is at the command of the will. When we speak of a man’s practice, we have respect to those things that he does as a free and voluntary agent, or, which is the same thing, to those things that he does by an act of his will; so that the whole of a man’s practice is directed by the faculty of the will. All the executive powers of the man, whether of body or mind, are subject to the faculty of the will by the constitution of Him who hath made man, and who is the great author of our being. The will is the fountain of the practice, as truly as the head of a spring is the fountain of the stream that flows from it. And, therefore, if a principle of true grace be seated in this faculty, it must necessarily tend to practice; as much as the flowing of water in the fountain tends to its flowing in the stream.
Second, it is the definition of grace, that it is a principle of holy action. What is grace but a principle of holiness, or a holy principle in the heart? But the word “principle” is relative to something, of which it is a principle. And if grace be a principle, what is it a principle of, but of action? Principles and actions are correlates, that necessarily have respect one to the other. Thus, the very idea of a principle of life is a principle that acts in the life. And so, when we speak of a principle of understanding, we mean a principle whence flow acts of understanding. And so by a principle of sin is meant a principle whence flow acts of sin. And, in the same manner, when we speak of a principle of grace, we mean a principle whence flow acts of grace, or gracious actions. A principle of grace has as much a relation to practice as a root has to the plant that it is the root of. If there be a root, it is the root of something; either the root of something that actually grows from it, or that tends to bring forth some plant. It is absurd to speak of a root that is the root of nothing; and so it is absurd to speak of a principle of grace that does not tend to grace in the practice.
Third, one more thing, by which that which is real and substantial is distinguished from that which is only a shadow or appearance, is, that it is effectual. A shadow or picture of a man, though it be ever so distinct or well drawn, or give ever so lively a representation, and though it be the picture of a very strong man, or even of a mighty giant, can do nothing. There is nothing accomplished and brought to pass by it, because it is not real, but only a shadow or image. The substance, or reality, however, is something that is effectual. And so it is with what is in the heart of man. That which is only an appearance or image of grace, though it looks like grace, is not effectual, because it wants reality and substance. But that which is real and substantial is effectual, and does indeed bring something to pass in the life. In other words, it acts itself out in practice. And so again,
Fourth, the nature of a principle of grace is to be a principle of life, or a vital principle. This we are everywhere taught in the Scriptures. There, natural men, who have no principle of grace in the heart, are represented as dead men, while those that have grace are represented as being alive, or having the principle of life in them. But it is the nature of a principle of life to be a principle of action and operation. A dead man does not act, or move, or bring anything to pass; but in living persons, the life appears by a continued course of action from day to day. They move, and walk, and work, and fill up their time with actions that are the fruits of life.
Fifth, true Christian grace is not only a principle of life, but an exceedingly powerful principle. Hence we read of “the power of godliness,” as in 2 Tim. 3:5; and are taught that there is in it a divine power, such as was wrought in Christ when he was raised from the dead. But the more powerful any principle is, the more effectual it is to produce those operations and that practice to which it tends.
Having thus shown, in general, that all true grace in the heart tends to holy practice in the life, I proceed, as was proposed,
II. To show the same with respect to the particular Christian graces. — And here, I remark, that this is the case,
1. With respect to a true and saving faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. — This is one thing that very much distinguishes that faith which is saving from that which is only common. A true faith is a faith that works; whereas a false faith is a barren and inoperative faith. And therefore the apostle describes a saving faith as a “faith that worketh by love” (Gal. 5:6). And the apostle James tells us, “A man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: show me thy faith without thy works, and I will show thee my faith by my works” (Jam. 2:18). But more particularly,
First, the conviction of the understanding and judgment, which is implied in saving faith, tends to holy practice. He that has true faith is convinced of the reality and certainty of the great things of religion; and he that is convinced of the reality of these things will be influenced by them, and they will govern his actions and behavior. If men are told of great things, which, if true, do most intimately concern them, and do not believe what they are told, they will not be much moved by them, nor will they alter their conduct for what they hear. But if they do really believe what they are told, and regard it as certain, they will be influenced by it in their actions, and in view of it will alter their conduct, and will do very differently from what they would if they had heard nothing. We see that this is so in all things of great concern that appear real to men. If a man hears important news that concerns himself, and we do not see that he alters at all for it in his practice, we at once conclude that he does not give heed to it as true; for we know the nature of man is such, that he will govern his actions by what he believes and is convinced of. And so if men are really convinced of the truth of the things they are told in the gospel, about an eternal world, and the everlasting salvation that Christ has purchased for all that will accept it, it will influence their practice. They will regulate their behavior according to such a belief, and will act in such a manner as will tend to their obtaining this eternal salvation. If men are convinced of the certain truth of the promises of the gospel, which promise eternal riches, and honors, and pleasures, and if they really believe that those are immensely more valuable than all the riches, and honors, and pleasures of the world, they will, for these, forsake the things of the world, and, if need be, sell all and follow Christ. If they are fully convinced of the truth of the promise, that Christ will indeed bestow all these things upon his people, and if all this appears real to them, it will have influence on their practice, and it will induce them to live accordingly. Their practice will be according to their convictions. The very nature of man forbids that it should be otherwise. If a man be promised by another that if he will part with one pound he will give him a thousand, and if he is fully convinced of the truth of this promise, he will readily part with the former in the assurance of obtaining the latter. And so he that is convinced of the sufficiency of Christ to deliver him from all evil, and to bring him to the possession of all good that he needs, will be influenced in his practice by the promise which offers him all this. Such a man, while he actually has such a conviction, will not be afraid to believe Christ in things wherein he otherwise would seem greatly to expose himself to calamity, for he is convinced that Christ is able to deliver him. And so he will not be afraid to forego other ways of securing earthly happiness, because he is convinced that Christ alone is sufficient to bestow all needed happiness upon him. And so,
Second, that act of the will, which there is in saving faith, tends to holy practice. He that, by the act of his will, does truly accept of Christ as a Savior, accepts of him as a Savior from sin, and not merely as a Savior from the punishment of sin. But it is impossible that anyone should heartily receive Christ as a Savior from sin, and from the ways of sin, if he has not willed and does not aim, sincerely, in heart and life, to turn from all the ways of sin; for he that has not willed that sin and he should part, cannot have willed to receive Christ as his Savior to part them. And so he, again, that receives Christ by a living faith, closes with him as a Lord and King to rule over and reign in him, and not merely as a priest to make atonement for him. But to choose Christ, and close with him as a King, is the same as to yield in submission to his law, and in obedience to his authority and commands; and he that does this, lives a life of holy practice.
Third, all the true trust in God, that is implied in saving faith, tends to holy practice. And herein a true trust differs from all false trust. A trust in God in the way of negligence, is what in Scripture is called tempting God; and a trust in him in the way of sin, is what is called presumption, which is a thing terribly threatened in his Word. But he that truly and rightly trusts in God, trusts in him in the way of diligence and holiness; or, which is the same thing, in the way of holy practice. The very idea of our trusting in another, is, resting or living in acquiescence of mind and heart in the full persuasion of his sufficiency and faithfulness, so as to be ready fully to venture on him in our actions. But they that do not practice and act upon the persuasion of another’s sufficiency and faithfulness, do not thus venture. They do not enter on any action or course of action in such a confidence, and so venture nothing, and therefore cannot be said truly to trust. He that really trusts in another, ventures on his confidence. And so it is with those that truly trust in God. They rest in the full persuasion that God is sufficient and faithful, so as to proceed in this confidence to follow God, and, if need be, to undergo difficulties and hardships for him, because he has promised that they shall be no losers by such a course; and they have such confidence of this, that they can and do venture upon his promise, while those who are not willing thus to venture, show that they do not trust in him. They that have the full trust in God which is implied in a living faith, will not be afraid to trust God with their estates. It is so with respect to trust in men, that if those we have full confidence in desire to borrow anything of us, and promise to pay us again, and to pay us a hundred-fold, we are not afraid to venture, and do actually venture it. And so those that feel full confidence in God, are not afraid to lend to the Lord. And so, if we trust in God, we shall not be afraid to venture labor, and fighting, and watching, and suffering, and all things for him, since he has so abundantly promised to reward these things with that which will infinitely more than make up for all the losses or difficulties or sorrows we may experience in the way of duty. If our faith be saving, it will lead us thus actually to venture on God, in the fullest trust in his character and promises. And as faith, in itself, and in all that is implied in it, tends to holy practice, so the same is the case,
2. With respect to all true love to God. — Love is an active principle — a principle that we always find is active in things of this world. Love to our fellow creatures always influences us in our actions and practice. The whole world of mankind are chiefly kept in action from day to day, and from year to year, by love of some kind or another. He that loves money is influenced in his practice by that love, and kept by it in the continual pursuit of wealth. He that loves honor is governed in his practice by that love, and his actions through the whole of life are regulated by his desire for it. And how diligently do they that love carnal pleasures pursue after them in their practice! And so he that truly loves God is also influenced by that love in his practice. He constantly seeks after God in the course of his life: seeks his grace, and acceptance, and glory.
Reason teaches that a man’s actions are the most proper test and evidence of his love. Thus, if a man professes a great deal of love and friendship to another, reason, in such a case, teaches all mankind that the most proper evidence of his being a real and hearty friend, as he professes to be, is his appearing a friend in his deeds, and not only in his words; and that he shall be willing, if need be, to deny himself for his friend, and to suffer in his own private interest for the sake of doing him a kindness. If a man professes ever so much kindness or friendship, a wise man will not trust the profession, except as he sees the trial and proof of it in the behavior; unless in his actions he has found him a faithful and constant friend, ready to do and suffer for him. He will trust to such evidence of his love, more than he will to the greatest professions or even the most solemn oaths without it. And so, if we see a man who, by his constant behavior, shows himself ready to take pains and lay himself out for God, reason teaches, that in this he gives an evidence of love to God, more to be depended on than if he only professes that he feels great love to God in his heart. And so, if we see a man who, by what we behold of the course of his life, seems to follow and imitate Christ, and greatly lay himself out for Christ’s honor and the advancement of his kingdom in the world, reason teaches, that he gives greater evidence of the sincerity and strength of his love to the Savior than if he only declares that he loves Him, and tells how his heart at such and such a time was drawn out in love to Him, while at the same time he is backward to do any great matter for Christ, or to put himself out of the way for the promotion of his kingdom, and is ready to excuse himself when called to active effort or self-denial for his Savior’s sake.
There are various ways for the exercise of sincere love to God, and they all tend to holy practice. One is, in having a high esteem for God; for that which we love we have the highest esteem for, and naturally show this esteem in our behavior. Another way of showing our love to God is, in making choice of him above all other things; and if we do sincerely choose him above all other things, then we shall actually leave other things for him when it comes to the trial in our practice: and when, in the course of our life, it comes to pass that God and our honor, or God and our money, or God and our ease, are at the same time set before us, so that we must cleave to the one and forsake the other, then, if we really choose God above these other things, we shall in our practice cleave to God, and let these things go. Another way of the exercise of love to God is, in our desires after him; and these also tend to practice. He that really has earnest desires after God, will be stirred up actively to seek after him. He will apply himself to it as a business, just as men do for this world when they have earnest desires for a good which they believe is attainable. And still another way of the exercise of love to God is, in delighting in him, and finding satisfaction and happiness in him.; and this also tends to practice. He that really and sincerely delights more in God than in other things, and finds his satisfaction in God, will not forsake God for other things; and thus, by his conduct, he shows that he indeed is satisfied in him as his portion. And so it is in all cases. If we have had enjoyment in any possession whatever, and then afterward forsake it for something else, this is an evidence that we were not fully satisfied with it, and that we did not delight in it above all other things. In all these cases, the feelings and choices will be seen in the practice.
3. All true and saving repentance tends to holy practice. — In the original of the New Testament, the word commonly rendered “repentance” signifies a change of the mind; and men are said to repent of sin when they change their minds with respect to it, so that, though formerly they esteemed and approved of it, they now utterly disapprove and dislike it. But such a change of the mind must and does tend to a corresponding change of the practice. We see it to be so universally in other things. If a man has heretofore been engaged in any pursuit or business whatever, and then changes his mind upon it, he will change his practice also, and will cease from that business or pursuit, or way of life, and turn his hand to some other. Sorrow for sin is one thing belonging to saving repentance. But sorrow for sin, if it be thorough and sincere, will tend, in practice, to the forsaking of sin. And so it is in everything. If a man has long gone on in any one way or manner of behavior, and afterwards is convinced of the foolishness and sinfulness of it, and is heartily sorry and grieved for it, the natural and necessary effect of this will be, that he will avoid it for the future. And if he goes on in it just as he did before, no one will believe that he is heartily sorry for having gone on in time past. Again,
4. All true humility tends to holy practice. — This is a grace abundantly recommended and insisted on in the Bible, and which is often spoken of as distinguishing a true Christian experience from that which is counterfeit. But this grace in the heart has a direct tendency to holy practice in the life. An humble heart tends to an humble behavior. He that is sensible of his own littleness, and nothingness, and exceeding unworthiness, will be disposed, by a sense of it, to carry himself accordingly both before God and man. He that once was of a proud heart, and under the dominion of pride in his conduct, if afterward he has his heart changed to an humble heart, will necessarily have a corresponding change in his behavior. He will no longer appear in his demeanor as proud, and scornful, and ambitious as once he was, affecting as much as ever to appear above others, and striving as much after it, and as apt to condemn others, and to be dissatisfied or even enraged with those that seem to stand in the way of his earthly glory. For that which such a behavior in him arose from, before he was changed, was pride of heart; and, therefore, if now there be a great alteration with respect to this pride of heart, and it be mortified and banished from the soul, and humility implanted in its place, surely there will be an alteration, also, in the demeanor and practice; for humility of heart is a principle that has as strong a tendency to practice as pride of heart has; and therefore, if the latter be mortified, and the former take its place, then the proud practice that proceeded from the former will proportionably cease, and the humble practice which is the natural fruit of the latter will be manifest.
True Christian humility of heart tends also to make persons resigned to the will of God, and to lead them to be patient and submissive to his holy hand under the afflictions he may send, and to be filled with deep reverence toward the Deity, and to treat divine things with the highest respect. It leads also to a meek behavior toward men, making us condescending to inferiors, respectful to superiors, and toward all gentle, peaceful, easy to be entreated, not self-willed, not envious of others, but contented with our own condition, of a calm and quiet spirit, not disposed to resent injuries, but apt to forgive. And surely these are traits that belong to holy practice. And so again,
5. All true fear of God tends to holy practice. — The principal thing meant in the Scriptures by the fear of God, is a holy solicitude or dread lest we should offend God by sinning against him. Now, if a man do truly fear to offend God, and if he habitually dreads the thought of sinning against him, this will surely tend to his avoiding sin against him. That which men are afraid of they will shun. If a man professes that he is afraid and has a dread of a poisonous serpent, for example, but at the same time is seen to take no care to shun him, but is very bold to keep near to him, who will believe his profession? Fearing God and observing to do all his commandments, are joined together as necessarily arising the one from the other, as in Deu. 28:58 — “If thou will not observe to do all the words of this law, that are written in this book, that thou mayest fear this glorious and fearful name, the Lord thy God.” And Joseph gives as a reason of his righteous and merciful conduct towards his brethren, that he feared God, as may be seen in Gen. 42:18. And in Pro. 8:13, it is said, that “the fear of the Lord is to hate evil.” Job gives it as a reason why he avoided sin, that “destruction from God was a terror to him” (Job 31:23). And God himself, when he speaks of Job as “eschewing evil,” mentions his fear of God as the ground and reason of it (Job 1:8). And in any person whatever, just so far as the fear of God reigns, just so far will it lead its possessor to avoid sin and to aim to be holy. Again,
6. The spirit of thankfulness and praise tends to holy practice. — Sincere thankfulness to God leads us to render again according to the benefits received. This we look upon as a sure evidence of true gratitude or thankfulness toward our fellowmen. If anyone does his neighbor any remarkable kindness, and he is really thankful for it, he will be ready, when an occasion offers, to do him a good in return. And though we cannot requite God’s kindness to us by doing anything that shall be profitable to him, yet a spirit of thankfulness will dispose us to do what we can, which is well-pleasing or acceptable to him, or which may tend to his declarative glory. If one man should take pity on another who was in some great distress, or in danger of some terrible death, and, moved by this pity, should greatly lay himself out for his defense and deliverance, and should undergo great hardships and sufferings in order to it, and by these means should actually deliver him; and if the latter should express great thankfulness toward his deliverer, and yet in his actions and course of conduct should oppose and dishonor and cast contempt upon him, and do him great injury, no one would give much heed to all his professions of thankfulness. If he is truly thankful, he will never act thus wickedly toward his benefactor. And so no man can be truly thankful to God for the dying love of Christ, and for the infinite mercy and love of God toward himself, and yet lead a wicked life. His gratitude, if sincere, will lead him to be holy. The same is true, again,
7. Of a Christian weanedness from the world, and of heavenly-mindedness, that they tend to holy practice. — And I speak of the two together, for they are very much the same thing, expressed negatively and positively. Not to be weaned from the world, is the same thing as to be worldly-minded; and, on the other hand, to have a truly Christian weanedness from the world, is to be not worldly, but heavenly-minded. And this grace, like all the others mentioned, tends to holy practice. If the heart be taken off from the world, it will tend to take off the pursuits from the world; and if the heart be set on heavenly things, which are things not of the world, it will tend to lead us to pursue the things that are heavenly. He that has his heart loose from the world, will not practically keep the world close in his grasp, as being exceeding loath to part with any of it. If a man, speaking of his experience, tells how, at some given time, he felt his heart weaned from the world, so that the world seemed as nothing and vanity to him, and yet if in practice he seems as violent after the world as ever, and a great deal more earnest after it than he is after heavenly things, such as growth in grace, and in the knowledge of God, and in duty, then his profession will have but little weight in comparison with his practice. And so, if his conduct shows that he thinks more of treasure on earth than of treasure in heaven, and if; when he has got the world, or some part of it, he hugs it close, and appears exceedingly reluctant to let even a little of it go for pious and charitable uses, though God promises him a thousand-fold more in heaven for it, he gives not the least evidence of his being weaned from the world, or that he prefers heavenly things to the things of the world. Judging by his practice, there is sad reason to believe that his profession is in vain. The same is true, also,
8. Of the spirit of Christian love to men, that this also tends to holy practice. — If the spirit of love to man be sincere, it will tend to the practice and deeds of love. That is a hypocritical, and not a sincere love, that appears only in word and tongue, and not in deed; but that love which is sincere, and really a true love, will be manifest in the deeds, as says the apostle, “My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue, but in deed and in truth. And hereby we know that we are of the truth, and shall assure our hearts before him” (1 John 3:18, 19). No other love to brethren, except that which shows itself in deeds of love, will profit any man. “If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, and one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body, what doth it profit?” (Jam. 2:15, 16.)
Experience shows, that those who cherish a sincere love toward others, are ready both to do and suffer for them. We are very ready to believe that parents love their own children, because this is natural; and such a love generally prevails throughout the world. But, incredible as it is that a man should not love his own children, yet, if there was a father that beheld his child in suffering circumstances, and would not put himself out of the way to relieve him, or that did not ordinarily treat his children with consideration and kindness, but acted from day to day as though he were utterly careless of their comfort, or as to what became of them, we should scarcely believe that he had anything of a father’s love in his heart. Love to our children will dispose us to loving deeds to our children. And so love to our neighbor will dispose us to all manner of good practice toward our neighbor. So the apostle declares, when, after summing up the several commandments of the second table of the law, he says, “And if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself;” and then adds, “Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law” (Rom. 13:9, 10). Once more, and lastly, the same remark applies,
9. To a true and gracious hope, that this also tends to holy practice. — A false hope has a tendency just the reverse of this. It tends to licentiousness — to encourage men in their sinful desires and lusts, and to flatter and embolden them even when they are in the way of evil. But a true hope, so far from hardening men in sin, and making them careless of their duty, tends to stir them up to holiness of life, to awaken them to duty, and to make them more careful to avoid sin, and more diligent in serving God. “Every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as he is pure” (1 John 3:3). A gracious hope has this tendency, from the nature of the happiness hoped for, which is a holy happiness; a happiness that the more a man seeks and hopes for, the more he is quickened and enlivened in the disposition to be holy. And it also has this tendency from the respect it has to the author of the happiness hoped for; for it hopes for it from God, as the fruit of his undeserved and infinite mercy; and, therefore, by every motive of gratitude, the heart is engaged and stirred up to seek that which is well-pleasing to him. And it has the same tendency from a regard to the means by which it hopes to obtain this happiness; for a true hope looks forward to the obtaining of happiness in no other way but the way of the gospel, which is by a holy Savior, and in a way of cleaving to and following him. And it has, lastly, the same tendency by the influence of that which is the immediate source of all gracious hope, which is faith in Christ; and such faith always works, and works by love, and purifies the heart, and brings forth holy fruits in the life.
Thus it has been shown, first by general arguments, and then by an induction of particulars, wherein all the principal Christian graces have been mentioned, that all true grace in the heart tends to holy practice in the life, just as truly as the root of the plant tends to growth in the plant itself, or as light has a tendency to shine, or the principle of life to manifest itself in the actions of the living person
In the application of the subject,
1. We may see one main reason why Christian practice and good works are so abundantly insisted on in the Scriptures as an evidence of sincerity in grace. — Christ has given it as a rule to us, that we are to judge men by their fruits (Mat. 7:16-20); and he insists on it, in a very emphatic manner, that the one that keeps his commandments is the one that truly loves him (John 14:21); and declares that the man that loves him will keep them, and the man that does not love him will not keep them (John 14:23, 24). Hence we may see the reason why the apostle Paul so much insisted on this point, declaring to those to whom he wrote, that if any pretended to belong to the kingdom of God, and yet did not keep God’s commandments, they were either hypocrites or self-deceivers. His language is, “For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience” (Eph. 5:5, 6). “Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God” (1 Cor. 6:9, 10). “They that are Christ’s have crucified the flesh, with the affections and lusts” (Gal. 5:24). “If ye live after the flesh, ye shall die” (Rom. 8:13). And all this teaches us the reason why the same thing is so much insisted on by the apostle James, in various places with which you are familiar, and by the apostle John, more than almost any other subject. It is because God would have it deeply impressed on all, that good works are the only satisfying evidence that we are truly possessed of grace in the soul. It is by our practice that God judges us here on earth, and it is by our practice that he will judge us all at the great and final day.
2. In view of this subject, let all examine themselves, whether their grace is real and sincere. — Let everyone diligently and prayerfully ask whether their graces all tend to practice, and are seen from day to day in the life and conduct. But here even some truly godly persons may be ready to say, that if they judge themselves by their practice, they must condemn themselves, for they fail so much and so frequently, and are so often wandering out of the way, that at times it scarcely seems that they can be the children of God. But to such I answer, that persons who try themselves by their practice, may find that they greatly fail every day, and are often wandering out of the way, and yet they may really see no just cause in their practice to condemn themselves. For when we speak of a life of Christian practice, and when the Scriptures speak of the course of life as Christian, the meaning is not, that the life is a perfect and. sinless life; on the contrary, a Christian’s life may be attended with many and exceeding great imperfections, and yet be a holy life, or a truly Christian life. It may be such a life as to clearly, and even necessarily show, that the grace which the individual has, is of the kind which has a tendency to holy practice. His fruits may be such as to be good evidence of the good nature of the tree, and his works such as to show his faith. And if you ask for still further light, then I would say, whatever your imperfections and failings may be, examine yourself whether you find the following evidences of your grace being of that kind which tends to holy practice.
First, has your supposed grace such influence as to render those things in which you have failed of holy practice, loathsome, grievous, and humbling to you? Has it such influence in your mind as to render your past sinful practices hateful in your eyes, and has it led you to mourn before God for them? And does it render those things in your conduct that, since your supposed conversion, have been contrary to Christian practice, odious in your eyes? And is it the great burden of your life, that your practice is no better? Is it really grievous to you, that you have fallen, or do fall into sin? and are you ready, after the example of holy Job, to abhor yourself for it, and repent in dust and ashes? and, like Paul, to lament your wretchedness, and pray to be delivered from sin, as you would from a body of death?
Second, do you carry about with you, habitually, a dread of sin? Do you not only mourn, and humble yourself for sins that are past, but have you a dread of sin for the future? And do you dread it because in itself it is evil, and so hurtful to your own soul, and offensive to God? Do you dread it as a terrible enemy that you have often suffered by, and feel that it has been a grievous thing to you heretofore? And do you dread it as something that has hurt, and wounded, and stung you, so that you would see it no more? Do you stand on your watch against it, as a man would keep watch against something that he dreads, with such a dread as led Joseph to say, “How can I do this great wickedness, and sin against God?” (Gen. 39:9.)
Third, are you sensible of the beauty and pleasantness of the ways of holy practice? Do you see the beauty of holiness, and the loveliness of the ways of God and Christ? It is said in the text that “charity rejoiceth in the truth;” and it is given as the character of the truly godly, that “he rejoiceth and worketh righteousness,” which is the same as saying that “he rejoices to work righteousness.” And how often does the Psalmist speak of the law of God as being his delight, and of his love to the divine commandments!
Fourth, do you find that you do particularly esteem and delight in those practices that may, by way of eminence, be called Christian practices, in distinction from mere worldly morality? And by Christian practices are meant such as are implied in a meek, humble, prayerful, self-denying, self-renouncing, heavenly walk and behavior. Some of the heathen have been eminent for many of the moral virtues, and wrote excellently about them, as, for example, of justice, and generosity, and fortitude, etc.; but they were far from a Christian poverty of spirit and lowliness of mind. They sought their own glory, and gloried exceedingly in their outward virtues, and seemed to know nothing of such a walk as the gospel commands, a walk of self-emptiness, and poverty of spirit, and self-distrust, and self-renunciation, and prayerful reliance on God. They were strangers to meekness, and did not allow, or even dream, that the forgiveness and love of enemies was a virtue. Such virtues as these are peculiarly Christian virtues, and Christian by way of distinction and eminence, and of these it is, that I ask, if you hold them in special esteem, for your Savior’s sake, and because they are fraught with his spirit? If you are essentially distinguished and different in your spirit from the mere moralist, or the heathen sage or philosopher, you will have a spirit of special esteem for and delight in those virtues that do especially belong to the gospel.
Fifth, do you hunger and thirst after a holy practice? Do you long to live a holy life, to be conformed to God, to have your conduct, day by day, better regulated, and more spiritual, more to God’s glory, and more such as becometh a Christian? Is this what you love, and pray for, and long for, and live for? This is mentioned by Christ, as belonging to the character of true Christians, that they “hunger and thirst after righteousness.” Does this trait belong to you?
Sixth, do you make a business of endeavoring to live holily, and as God would have you, in all respects? Not only can you be said to endeavor after holiness, but do you make a business of endeavoring after it? Is it a matter that lies with weight upon your mind? A true and faithful Christian does not make holy living a mere incidental thing, but it is his great concern. As the business of the soldier is to fight, so the business of the Christian is to be like Christ, to be holy as he is holy. Christian practice is the great work that he is engaged in, just as the race was the great work of the racers. Is this so with you? And is it your great aim and love to keep all God’s commandments, and so far as known to neglect none? “Then,” says the Psalmist, “I shall not be ashamed, when I have respect unto all thy commandments.” Is this your serious, constant, and prayerful aim, that you may be faithful in every known duty? And once more,
Seventh, do you greatly desire that you may know all that is your duty? And do you desire to know it that you may do it? With the patriarch Job, can you, and do you, pray to the Almighty, “That which I see not, teach thou me,” adding, as he added, to the great Searcher of hearts, “If I have done iniquity, I will do no more”?
If you can honestly meet these tests, then you have the evidence that your grace is of the kind that tends to holy practice, and to growth in it. And though you may fall, through God’s mercy you shall rise again. He that hath begun a good work in you will carry it on until the day of Jesus Christ. Though you may be at times faint, yet, if pursuing, you shall be borne on from strength to strength, and kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation.
http://www.biblebb.com/files/edwards/charity11.htm
Phillip Jacob Spener:
Thought should be given to the more extensive use of the Word of God among us. We know that by nature we have no good in us. If there is to be any good in us, it must be brought about by God. To this end the Word of God is the powerful means, since faith must be enkindled through the gospel, and the law provides the rules for good works and many wonderful impulses to attain them. The more at home the Word of God is among us, the more we shall bring about faith and its fruits.
It may appear that the Word of God has sufficiently free course among us inasmuch as at various places (as in this city [Frankfurt am Main]) there is daily or frequent preaching from the pulpit. When we reflect further on the matter, however, we shall find that with respect to this first proposal, more is needed. I do not at all disapprove of the preaching of sermons in which a Christian congregation is instructed by the reading and exposition of a certain text, for I myself do this. But I find that this is not enough. In the first place, we know that “all Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:16). Accordingly all Scripture, without exception, should be known by the congregation if we are all to receive the necessary benefit. If we put together all the passages of the Bible which in the course of many years are read to a congregation in one place, they will comprise only a very small part of the Scriptures which is nevertheless of the greatest importance. In the second place, the people have little opportunity to grasp the meaning of the Scriptures except on the basis of those passages which may have been expounded to them, and even less do they have opportunity to become as practiced in them as edification requires. Meanwhile, although solitary reading of the Bible at home is in itself a splendid and praiseworthy thing, it does not accomplish enough for most people.
It should therefore be considered whether the church would not be well advised to introduce the people to Scripture in still other ways than through the customary sermons on the appointed lessons. This might be done, first of all, by diligent reading of the Holy Scriptures, especially of the New Testament. It would not be difficult for every housefather to keep a Bible, or at least a New Testament, handy and read from it every day or, if he cannot read, to have somebody else read. . . .
Then a second thing would be desirable in order to encourage people to read privately, namely, that where the practice can be introduced the books of the Bible be read one after another, at specified times in the public service, without further comment (unless one wished to add brief summaries). This would be intended for the edification of all, but especially of those who cannot read at all, or cannot read easily or well, or of those who do not own a copy of the Bible.
For a third thing it would perhaps not be expedient (and I set this down for further and more mature reflection) to reintroduce the ancient and apostolic kind of church meetings. In addition to our customary services with preaching, other assemblies would also be held in the manner in which Paul describes them in 1 Corinthians 14:26-40. One person would not rise to preach (although this practice would be continued at other times), but others who have been blessed with gifts and knowledge would speak and present their pious opinions on the proposed subject to the judgment of the rest, doing all this in such a way as to avoid disorder and strife.
http://radicalrenovation.wordpress.com/2007/06/10/philip-jakob-spener-on-scripture-and-the-christian-life/
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar